Preponderance of your evidence (likely to be than simply perhaps not) is the evidentiary burden not as much as one another causation standards
Staub v. Pr) (applying “cat’s paw” concept so you’re able to a beneficial retaliation allege underneath the Uniformed Attributes A career and Reemployment Legal rights Operate, that’s “very similar to Name VII”; carrying one to “if the a manager works an act passionate by antimilitary animus you to is intended from the manager resulting in an adverse employment action, Bangladeshi kvinnor med amerikansk man assuming that work is an excellent proximate reason behind a perfect employment action, then your company is liable”); Zamora v.